Application by Maksimilian Bebic, Mile Nekic and Vjekoslav Brajkovic pursuant to s 78 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW)

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• R(Crown) v Roger Caleb Rogerson (Accused)
• Rogerson v R; McNamara v R
• Application of Peter James Holland under s.78 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001

[See more]

• Kirk Group Holdings Pty Ltd and Another v Workcover Authority of New South Wales and Another
• Eastman v DPP (Act)
• Richard William Buttrose v Attorney General of New South Wales
• Application by Brian Steer under Part 7 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001
• Ivan Robert Marko Milat v R
• Clark v Attorney General of New South Wales
• Application by AZ for inquiry into conviction pursuant to s 78 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW)

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2022] NSWSC 1153

This document cites

• Eastman v DPP (Act)
• Richard William Buttrose v Attorney General of New South Wales
• Ivan Robert Marko Milat v R
• R(Crown) v Roger Caleb Rogerson (Accused)
• Application of Peter James Holland under s.78 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001



See all quotations

• Kirk Group Holdings Pty Ltd and Another v Workcover Authority of New South Wales and Another
• Clark v Attorney General of New South Wales
• Application by Brian Steer under Part 7 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001
• Application by AZ for inquiry into conviction pursuant to s 78 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW)
• Rogerson v R; McNamara v R