Application by Lucy Patricia Klewer pursuant to s 78 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW)

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Attorney General in and for the State of New South Wales v Klewer (No 3)
• Klewer v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (No 2)
• Eastman v DPP (Act)

[See more]

• Frank Sinkovich v The Honourable Justice Megan Latham
• Application of Peter James Holland under s.78 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001
• Attorney General in and for the State of New South Wales v Malcolm Huntley Potier
• Malcolm Huntley Potier v Attorney General in and for the State of New South Wales
• Kirk Group Holdings Pty Ltd and Another v Workcover Authority of New South Wales and Another
• Kostov v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (No 2)
• Patsalis v State of New South Wales
• Parker v Comptroller-General of Customs

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2021] NSWSC 1225

CONSIDERED in

• Huynh v Attorney General (NSW)

This document cites

• Patsalis v State of New South Wales
• Eastman v DPP (Act)
• Malcolm Huntley Potier v Attorney General in and for the State of New South Wales
• Parker v Comptroller-General of Customs
• Frank Sinkovich v The Honourable Justice Megan Latham



See all quotations

• Application of Peter James Holland under s.78 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001
• Attorney General in and for the State of New South Wales v Malcolm Huntley Potier
• Attorney General in and for the State of New South Wales v Klewer (No 3)
• Kirk Group Holdings Pty Ltd and Another v Workcover Authority of New South Wales and Another
• Klewer v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (No 2)
• Kostov v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (No 2)