Antitrust law - Second Circuit interprets the Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvements Act as requirement for establishing jurisdiction in U.S. courts.

This document cites

• Federal Cases - 109 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 1997), 96-2001, United States v. Nippon Paper Industries Co., Ltd.
• Federal Cases - 148 F.2d 416 (2nd Cir. 1945), 144, United States v. Aluminum Co. of America
• Federal Cases - 157 F.3d 922 (2nd Cir. 1998), 97-9258, Filetech S.A. v. France Telecom S.A.
• Federal Cases - 544 F.Supp.2d 236 (S.D.N.Y. 2008), 07 Civ. 3007, Boyd v. AWB Ltd.
• Federal Cases - 904 F.Supp.2d 310 (E.D.N.Y. 2012), 06-MD-1738 (BMC)(JO), In re Vitamin C Antitrust Litigation



See all quotations

• Federal Cases - 322 F.3d 942 (7th Cir. 2003), 01-1693, United Phosphorus v. Angus Chemical CO.
• Federal Cases - 683 F.3d 845 (7th Cir. 2012), 10-1712, Minn-Chem, Inc. v. Agrium, Inc.
• Federal Cases - 303 F.3d 293 (3rd Cir. 2002), 01-3135, Turicentro, S.A. v. American Airlines Inc.
• Federal Cases - 654 F.3d 462 (3rd Cir. 2011), 10-2288, Animal Science Products, Inc. v. China Minmetals Corp.
• Federal Cases - 379 F.3d 672 (9th Cir. 2004), 02-16472, United States v. LSL Biotechnologies
• Federal Cases - 241 F.3d 420 (5th Cir. 2001), 99-20763, Den Norske Stats Oljeselskap v Heeremac Vof
• Federal Cases - 822 F.Supp.2d 953 (N.D.Cal. 2011), MDL 1827, In re TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
• Federal Cases - 542 U.S. 155 (2004), 03-724, F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd. v. Empagran
• Federal Cases - 546 U.S. 500 (2006), 04-944, Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.
• Federal Cases - 213 U.S. 347 (1909), 686, American Banana Company
• Federal Cases - 274 U.S. 268 (1927), 200, United States v. Sisal Sales Corporation