An uncomfortable fit? Intellectual property policy and the administrative state.

This document cites

• Federal Cases - 287 F.2d 492 (2nd Cir. 1961), 162, Polaroid Corp. v. Polarad Elecs. Corp.
• Federal Cases - 541 F.Supp.2d 805 (E.D.Va. 2008), 1 07cv846, Tafas v. Dudas
• Federal Cases - 289 F.2d 496 (Fed. Cir. 1961), 6608, In re Application of Deister Concentrator Co.
• Federal Cases - 476 F.2d 1357 (Fed. Cir. 1973), 8866, In re Application of E. I. DuPont DeNemours & Co.
• Federal Cases - 146 F.3d 983 (D.C. Cir. 1998), 97-7093, Material Supply Intern., Inc. v. Sunmatch Indus. Co., Ltd.



See all quotations

• Federal Cases - 406 F.3d 689 (D.C. Cir. 2005), 04-1037, American Library Ass'n. v. F.C.C.
• Federal Cases - 362 F.3d 1359 (Fed. Cir. 2004), 02-1550, Kinik Co. v. International Trade Com'n.
• Federal Cases - 415 F.3d 44 (D.C. Cir. 2005), 03-7162, Pro-Football, Inc. v. Harjo
• Federal Cases - 565 F.3d 880 (D.C. Cir. 2009), 03-7162, Pro Football, Inc. v. Harjo
• Federal Cases - 565 F.3d 846 (Fed. Cir. 2009), 2007-1014, Amgen Inc. v. International Trade Com'n
• Federal Cases - 586 F.3d 1369 (Fed. Cir. 2009), 2008-1352, Tafas v. Kappos
• Federal Cases - 284 F.Supp.2d 96 (D.D.C. 2003), Civ. A. 99-1385, Pro-Football, Inc. v. Harjo
• Federal Cases - 567 F.Supp.2d 46 (D.D.C. 2008), 99-1385, Pro-Football, Inc. v. Harjo
• Federal Cases - 467 U.S. 837 (1984), 82-1005, Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
• Federal Cases - 545 U.S. 913 (2005), 04-480, Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd.