Amir Hamzah Bin Berang Kuty v Public Prosecutor

Core Citations

DISTINGUISHES

• Gopalakrishnan Vanitha v Public Prosecutor

REFERS TO

• Public Prosecutor v Tan Fook Sum
• R v Sargeant
• Chua Tiong Tiong v Public Prosecutor

FOLLOWS

• Arts Niche Cyber Distribution Pte Ltd v Public Prosecutor
• Chua Poh Kiat Anothony v Public Prosecutor
• Soong Hee Sin v Public Prosecutor

[See more]

• Tan Hung Yeoh v Public Procsecutor
• Yeo Choon Huat v Public Prosecutor
• Kwang Boon Keong Peter v Public Prosecutor
• Lim Ah Poh v Public Prosecutor
• Public Prosecutor v Ng Tai Tee Janet and Another

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2002] SGHC 307
• [2003] 1 SLR 617

FOLLOWED in

• Khua Kian Keong and Another v Public Prosecutor

REFERRED in

• Viswanathan Ramachandran v Public Prosecutor
• Tuen Huan Rui Mary v Public Prosecutor

This document cites

• R v Sargeant
• Tan Hung Yeoh v Public Procsecutor
• Lim Ah Poh v Public Prosecutor
• Arts Niche Cyber Distribution Pte Ltd v Public Prosecutor
• Chua Tiong Tiong v Public Prosecutor



See all quotations

• Yeo Choon Huat v Public Prosecutor
• Public Prosecutor v Ng Tai Tee Janet and Another
• Chua Poh Kiat Anothony v Public Prosecutor
• Public Prosecutor v Tan Fook Sum
• Kwang Boon Keong Peter v Public Prosecutor
• Soong Hee Sin v Public Prosecutor
• Gopalakrishnan Vanitha v Public Prosecutor
• Penal Code 1871
• Evidence Act 1893