Almond v Ash Brothers & Heaton Ltd ; Dawkins (Valuation Officer) v Ash Bros & Heaton Ltd
Linked as:
Extract
Almond v Ash Brothers & Heaton Ltd ; Dawkins (Valuation Officer) v Ash Bros & Heaton Ltd
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
CONSIDERS
- Smith v Churchwardens Company, of Birmingham
- The King against The Inhabitants of Mirfield
- Poplar Assessment Committee v Roberts
[See more]
REFERS TO
- Smith v Churchwardens Company, of Birmingham
- Consett Iron Company Ltd v Assessment Committee for No. 5 or North-Western Area of County of Durham
RESUELVE RECURSO
APPLIES
- Poplar Assessment Committee v Roberts
- Great Eastern Railway Company v The Overseers of Haughley, Resp
- R v South Staffordshire Waterworks Company
AFFIRMS
CONSIDERS
- Rating and Valuation Act 1925 - Articles : S-22
- Rating and Valuation Act 1925
- Valuation (Metropolis) Act 1869
[See more]
REPORTED OPINION OF in
REFERRED in
- Telereal Trillium v Kevin Hewitt (Valuation Officer)
- Iceland Foods Ltd v Jane a Berry (valuation Officer)
- S J & J Monk (A Firm) v Newbigin (Valuation Officer)
[See more]
CITED in
- Keith Newbigin (Valuation Officer) v S J & J Monk (A Firm)
- Commissioner of Valuation for Northern Ireland and Debenhams PLC
CONSIDERED in
This document cites
- Almond v Ash Brothers & Heaton Ltd ; Dawkins (Valuation Officer) v Ash Bros & Heaton Ltd
- Railway Assessment Authority v Southern Railway Co; London County Council v Southern Railway Company
- Langlands v Assessor for Midlothian
- Robinson Brothers (Brewers) Ltd v Houghton and Chester-le-Street Assessment Committee
- Smith v Churchwardens Company, of Birmingham