Albert v Lavin

Afectaciones

---

CONSIDERA

• R v Porritt
• Police Act 1964 - Artículos : S-51

APLICA

• Piddington v Bates
• R v Morgan

REFIERE

• R v Smith (David Raymond)

CONSIDERADA por

• Maguire v Chief Constable of Cumbria Constabulary
• R v Ronald Gardner
• Scott, Sandra v C. A. L. NO 14 Pty Ltd T/as Tandara Motor Inn (ACN No 009 504 081) Kirkpatrick, Michael Andrew

[ver más]

• CHIEF CONSTABLE of CLEVELAND POLICE v McGROGAN
• Jennifer Elaine Rita Colman-Archer (Appellant/Plaintiff) v The Chief Constable of Norfolk and Others (Respondents/Defendants)
• R v Peter Kelbie
• Faber v Attorney General et. al
• Dickson v Irwin
• Sidney Alphonso Addison (Plaintiff/Appellant) v The Chief Constable of the West Midlands Police
• Ipswich Town Football Club Company Ltd (Appellant/Claimant) v The Chief Constable of Suffolk Constabulary (Respondent/Defendant) The English Football League (Intervenor)
• 1. Jane Laporte and Another v The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis
• Edmond et Al v Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago
• The Queen (on the application of Brian Hicks and Others) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis
• Walker v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis
• Rita Porter (Claimant/AppellantClaimant/Appellant) v The Commissioner of Police for The Metropolis
• Doyle Amaro Mackey v The Director of Public Prosecutions
• Graeme Carter and State of Victoria v Donald S Walker and Dr Marcus T Walker
• Corey Dixon v Crown Prosecution Service
• Blench v DPP
• Oraki v Director of Public Prosecutions
• Kuru v State of New South Wales
• R (Cash) v HM Coroner for the County of Northamptonshire
• Austin v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis
• Coleman v Power

APLICADA por

• Joyce v Hertfordshire Constabulary

REPORTED OPINION OF por

• [1981] 145 JP 184
• [1981] 1 All ER 628
• 72 CrAppR 178

[ver más]

• [1981] 2 WLR 1070
• [1982] AC 546

CITADA NEUTRALMENTE por

• Albert v Lavin
• Beckford v The Queen
• R (Laporte) v Chief Constable of Gloucestershire Constabulary

REFERIDA por

• R v Phekoo

PUESTA EN DUDA por

• R v Kimber

DESAPROBADA por

• R v Williams (Gladstone)