Ajodha v The State; Chandree v The State; Fletcher v The State; Noreiga v The State

Core Citations

---

REFERS TO

• R v Anderson
• Gransaul v The Queen

CONSIDERS

• R v Glenroy Watson

APPLIES

• Ibrahim v R

CITED in

• R v Gabriel Kiernan, Kevin Kiernan, Sean Kiernan, Julian Burton, Nigel Coyne
• Mitchell (David) v R
• Cumberbatch (Glyne) v R

[See more]

• R v Mushtaq (Ashfaq Ahmed)
• The State of Dominica v Newton and Others
• Adams (Paul) and Tull (Daniel) v R
• R v Fisher (Fitzroy)
• Gill (Ian) v R
• The State v France
• Mohamed Omar v The State
• R v Palmer (Steven)
• Rabindra Deo v The State
• Walker (Donald) v R
• Benny v The State
• Henry v The State
• R v Williams
• Burke (George)
• François v The State
• Sona Lalloo and Razack Kadar v The State
• Fuller (Winston) v The State
• Penny (Elvis) v The State
• Aaron Lewis v R
• Oscar Francis Appellant v The Queen Respondent [ECSC]
• [1] Michael Matthew Swayne David [2] Stephen Sandy Appellants v The Queen Respondent [ECSC]

REFERRED in

• Macpherson v R
• Public Prosecutor v Gurdial Singh Pretum Singh
• Beckford (Emilio) and Kadett Brown v R

[See more]

• R v Kevin Simmonds
• Nicholas Dolor Appellant v The Queen Respondent [ECSC]
• Boyce et Al v R
• Muhammad bin Kadar v PP

CONSIDERED in

• R v David Alexander Taylor and Another
• Janet Elaine Carley (Respondent (Plaintiff) v Nigel Wayne Carley (Appellant
• R v Edward Cunningham

[See more]

• Ritch v R
• R v Patrick Austin and Others
• Habib v Nationwide News Pty Ltd
• Andrew Leroy Lovell Applicant v The Queen Respondent
• Massinissa Adams and Others v R
• Kadero Munroe v R; Michael Clarke v R
• Walker v R
• Omar v The State
• Evans v R
• Durrant v The Queen
• Stephenson v R
• Francis v R
• Forbes v R
• Omar Dacosta Holder v The Queen
• Rohan Shastri Rambarran v The Queen
• The State v Peters et Al
• Sealy v The Queen
• R v McLawrence
• Ward v R
• R v Boyd et Al
• Mark v The State of Trinidad and Tobago
• Mohammed et Al v The State
• Papan v The State
• Henry v The State
• Maynard, Gaskin, Phillips and John v R
• Gill v R
• The State v Peters et Al
• Benjamin and Ganga v The State
• R v Evans
• R v Henfield et Al
• Simeon Bain v R
• The State v Hoyte
• Lalloo and Kadar v The State
• Paul v The State
• The Queen v Deieur
• Deveaux v the Attorney General
• Dublin and Harewood v The Queen
• Collie et Al v Commissioner of Police
• Nichilas Dolor v The Queen
• Jelliseau et Al v R
• Harewood v The Queen
• Barry v The State
• Mahadeo v the State
• Atkins v R
• Taaj Oniel Muhammad v The King
• Weekes v R
• Richards v the State
• Boucher v The Queen
• The Queen v Knowles
• Callender et. al. v R
• Williams et Al v The Queen
• R v Hunter
• The Queen v Thomas
• David et Al v R
• Oliver et Al v The Queen
• The State v Floyd
• The State of Dominica v Newton et Al
• R v Johnson
• R v Dean
• Evans v R
• The State v Peters et Al
• Bachan v The State
• Gregory Durrant Appellant v The Queen Respondent [ECSC]
• Alexander v the Queen
• Stephen Stubbs v R
• Deo v The State
• Matthews v The State
• The State v Peters et Al
• Giordano Rolle Jr. v R
• Welch v R
• David Baptiste v The State
• Robateau v The Queen; Pipersburgh v The Queen
• The State v Jason Morris
• The State v Peters et Al
• Jairam et at v The State
• Sylvester et Al v The State
• Mcintosh v R

APPLIED in

• Cletus Timothy and Others v The State
• Thongjai v The Queen ; Chun-kong v The Queen
• R v Flemming

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• 73 CrAppR 129
• [1981] 2 All ER 193
• [1981] 3 WLR 1

[See more]

• [1982] AC 204

DISTINGUISHED in

• Public Prosecutor v Oh Laye Koh
• Seow Choon Meng v Public Prosecutor
• Nadunjalian v Public Prosecutor

FOLLOWED in

• Public Prosecutor v Tse Nathan and Another