Aiken v Kingborough Corporation

Core Citations

REFERS TO

• Thomas v Quartermaine
• Mersey Docks and Harbour Board Trustees v Gibbs; Mersey Docks and Harbour Board Trustees v Penhallow

CONSIDERS

• Purkis v Walthamstow Borough Council
• Lipman v Clendinnen

CITES

• Jury v Commissioner for Railways (Nsw)
• Ellis v Fulham Borough Council
• Coates v Rawtenstall Corporation

[See more]

• Gautret v Egerton; Jones v Egerton
• Haynes v Harwood
• M'Alister or Donoghue (Pauper) v Stevenson
• Buckle v Bayswater Road Board
• Latham v Johnson (R) & Nephew
• Francis v Cockrell

APPLIES

• R v Williams

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• 62 CLR 179

NOT FOLLOWED in

• Burrum Corporation v Richardson and Gehrmann

APPLIED in

• Nagle v Rottnest Island Authority
• Vairy v Wyong Shire Council

CONSIDERED in

• Schiller v Mulgrave Shire Council
• Geyer v Downs
• Coffs Harbour City Council v Polglase

CITED in

• Sutherland Shire Council v Heyman

This document cites

• M'Alister or Donoghue (Pauper) v Stevenson
• Mersey Docks and Harbour Board Trustees v Gibbs; Mersey Docks and Harbour Board Trustees v Penhallow
• Coates v Rawtenstall Corporation
• Haynes v Harwood
• R v Williams



See all quotations

• Purkis v Walthamstow Borough Council
• Francis v Cockrell
• Lipman v Clendinnen
• Jury v Commissioner for Railways (Nsw)
• Buckle v Bayswater Road Board
• Thomas v Quartermaine
• Gautret v Egerton; Jones v Egerton
• Ellis v Fulham Borough Council
• Latham v Johnson (R) & Nephew