Ahmed (Amos; Zambrano; R 15A(3)(C) 2006 EEA Regs) [Upper Tribunal]

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• MDB and Others v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• E-A (Article 8: Best Interests of Child: Nigeria)
• Iza Tom Idezuna v The Secretary of State for the Home Department

[See more]

• Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza

CONSIDERS

• Housing Act 1988
• Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002
• JM v Secretary of State for the Home Department

[See more]

• Alarape and Another (Article 12, EC R 1612/68) Nigeria
• Employment Act 2002
• Rent Act 1977

APPLIES

• Samsam (EEA: Revocation and Retained Rights) Syria
• Godwin Oche Amos v The Secretary of State for the Home Department

REFERS TO

• MF (Article 8 - New Rules) Nigeria [Upper Tribunal]
• Damion Harrison (Jamaica) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

FOLLOWS

• Oa (Eea - Retained Right of Residence)

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2013] INLR 505
• [2013] Imm AR 540

CONSIDERED in

• NA (Pakistan) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department The Aire Centre (Intervenors)
• Error of Law Decision by Upper Tribunal Judge P Lane: [Upper Tribunal]

This document cites

• Samsam (EEA: Revocation and Retained Rights) Syria
• MF (Article 8 - New Rules) Nigeria [Upper Tribunal]
• JM v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Oa (Eea - Retained Right of Residence)
• Godwin Oche Amos v The Secretary of State for the Home Department



See all quotations

• Damion Harrison (Jamaica) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza
• Iza Tom Idezuna v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Alarape and Another (Article 12, EC R 1612/68) Nigeria
• MDB and Others v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• E-A (Article 8: Best Interests of Child: Nigeria)
• Amos v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Rent Act 1977
• Employment Act 2002
• Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002
• Housing Act 1988
• The Immigration (European Economic Area) (Amendment) Regulations 2012
• The Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2006
• Gerardo Ruiz Zambrano v Office national de l’emploi (ONEm).
• Yoshikazu Iida v Stadt Ulm.
• G. B. C. Echternach and A. Moritz v Minister van Onderwijs en Wetenschappen.
• Maria Teixeira v London Borough of Lambeth and Secretary of State for the Home Department.
• Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Lucja Czop (C-147/11) and Margita Punakova (C-148/11).
• Shirley McCarthy v Secretary of State for the Home Department.
• O and S v Maahanmuuttovirasto and Maahanmuuttovirasto v L.
• London Borough of Harrow v Nimco Hassan Ibrahim and Secretary of State for the Home Department.
• Kunqian Catherine Zhu and Man Lavette Chen v Secretary of State for the Home Department.
• Murat Dereci and Others v Bundesministerium für Inneres.
• Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 of the Council of 15 October 1968 on freedom of movement for workers within the Community
• Council Directive 2003/86/EC of 22 September 2003 on the right to family reunification
• Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States amending Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 and repealing Directives 64/221/EEC, 68/360/EEC, 72/194/EEC, 73/148/EEC, 75/34/EEC, 75/35/EEC, 90/364/EEC, 90/365/EEC and 93/96/EEC (Text with EEA relevance)