Ahmad bin Abu Bakar v PP

Core Citations

DISTINGUISHES

• Manokaran and Another v PP

REFERS TO

• Metropolitan Properties Company (F.G.C.) Ltd v Lannon
• Nadeson v PP
• Abdul Aziz; PP

[See more]

• Leng Chow Teng; PP
• Leonard; PP
• R v Liverpool City Justices, ex parte Topping
• R v Sussex Justices, ex parte McCarthy
• PP; Subramaniam and Another
• Abdul Kadir bin Abdul Rahman v PP
• Chen Chong and Others v PP
• Chin Ban Keat v R
• Hassan bin Dollah v Public Prosecutor
• Law v Chartered Institute of Patent Agents
• Lian Kian Boon v PP

FOLLOWS

• Maleb bin Su v PP and Cheak Yoke Thong v PP
• Lee Weng Tuck and Another v PP
• Abdul Kadir bin Abdul Rahman v PP

[See more]

• Chen Chong and Others v PP
• Law v Chartered Institute of Patent Agents
• Lian Kian Boon v PP
• Nadeson v PP
• R v Liverpool City Justices, ex parte Topping
• R v Sussex Justices, ex parte McCarthy

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1998] 7 MLJ 391

This document cites

• Metropolitan Properties Company (F.G.C.) Ltd v Lannon
• Leng Chow Teng; PP
• Law v Chartered Institute of Patent Agents
• R v Sussex Justices, ex parte McCarthy
• Chin Ban Keat v R



See all quotations

• Nadeson v PP
• Leonard; PP
• R v Liverpool City Justices, ex parte Topping
• Chen Chong and Others v PP
• PP; Subramaniam and Another
• Manokaran and Another v PP
• Maleb bin Su v PP and Cheak Yoke Thong v PP
• Lian Kian Boon v PP
• Hassan bin Dollah v Public Prosecutor
• Abdul Kadir bin Abdul Rahman v PP
• Abdul Aziz; PP
• Lee Weng Tuck and Another v PP