Admiral Gaming Network Srl and Others v Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli and Others.

Core Citations

WORK EXPRESSION OF in

• Admiral Gaming Network Srl and Others v Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli and Others.

This document cites

• Edgard Jan De Clercq and Others.
• Criminal proceedings against Piergiorgio Gambelli and Others.
• Berlington Hungary Tanácsadó és Szolgáltató kft and Others v Magyar Állam.
• État belge, SPF Finances v NN (L) International.
• Stanley International Betting Ltd and Stanleybet Malta Ltd v Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze and Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli di Stato.



See all quotations

• Questore di Verona contra Diego Zenatti.
• Anonymi Geniki Etairia Tsimenton Iraklis (AGET Iraklis) v Ypourgos Ergasias, Koinonikis Asfalisis kai Koinonikis Allilengyis.
• Global Starnet Ltd v Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze and Amministrazione Autonoma Monopoli di Stato.
• Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice
• Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union 2016/C 202/01
• Elme Messer Metalurgs v Latvijas Investīciju un attīstības aģentūra.
• Federazione nazionale delle imprese elettrotecniche ed elettroniche (Anie) and et autres parties (à compléter avec la demande de renvoi préjudiciel) v Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico and Gestore dei servizi energetici (GSE) SpA.
• Real Vida Seguros SA v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira.
• Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 23 November 2021. Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive 2010/64/EU – Article 5 – Quality of the interpretation and translation – Directive 2012/13/EU – Right to information in criminal proceedings – Article 4(5) and Article 6(1) – Right to information about the accusation – Right to interpretation and translation – Directive 2016/343/EU – Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial – Article 48(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 267 TFEU – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Admissibility – Appeal in the interests of the law against a decision ordering a reference for a preliminary ruling – Disciplinary proceedings – Power of the higher court to declare the request for a preliminary ruling unlawful.#Case C-564/19.