Administrator, Natal v Edouard

Core Citations

REPORTS OPINION

• Administrator, Natal v Edouard

This document cites

• Jackson v Horizon Holidays Ltd
• Heywood v Wellers
• Jarvis v Swans Tours Ltd
• Cook v Swinfen
• Thake v Maurice



See all quotations

• Gray v Barr
• Emeh v Kensington and Chelsea and Westminster Area Health Authority
• Burton v Pinkerton
• Thake v Maurice
• Hobbs v London and South Western Railway Company
• Udale v Bloomsbury Area Health Authority
• Van der Westhuizen v Van Wyk and Another
• Holmdene Brickworks (Pty) Ltd v Roberts Construction Co Ltd
• Jockie v Meyer
• Victoria Falls & Transvaal Power Co Ltd v Consolidated Langlaagte Mines Ltd
• R v Swanepoel
• Bester v Commercial Union Versekeringsmaatskappy van SA Bpk
• Ranger v Wykerd and Another
• Bleazby v Bleazby
• Union Government (Minister of Railways and Harbours) v Warneke
• Government of the Republic of South Africa v Ngubane
• Robinson v Randfontein Estates Gm Co Ltd
• Bester v Smit
• Magna Alloys and Research (SA) (Pty) Ltd v Ellis
• Hoffa, NO v SA Mutual Fire & General Insurance Co Ltd
• Dippenaar v Shield Insurance Co Ltd
• Lamb v Sack
• Wells v South African Alumenite Company
• Ismail v Ismail
• Naude v Naude
• Novick v Benjamin
• Edouard v Administrator, Natal
• Griffiths v Evans
• New Jersey - P. v. Portadin
• New Hampshire - Kingsbury v. Smith, 81-150