Adler v Blackman

Core Citations

---

RESUELVE RECURSO

• Adler v Blackman

DISAPPROVES

• COVERED MARKETS, Ltd v GREEN

CITES

• Bank of Victoria v McHutchison, (1881)

APPLIES

• Ladies' Hosiery and Underwear Ltd v Parker

AFFIRMS

• Adler v Blackman

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1953] 1 QB 146
• 2 TLR 809
• [1952] 2 All ER 945

CONSIDERED in

• Genevieve Macattram v London Borough of Camden
• Church Commissioners England v Gisele Meya
• Diego Martin Consumers Co-Operative Society Ltd v Liverpool

[See more]

• Rahman et Al v Esack
• Burke v Bucher [SC App (Bda)]
• Coombs v Serrette
• Fitzpatrick v Moodie Kuhlalsingh
• Pantin et Al v Williams
• Merryl See Tai (t/a Kayak Centre), Trinikayak Ltd and Paddles Ltd v Chaguaramas Development Authority
• Alvina Whittaker v Anthony David Kinnear (acting by his agents on Gershinson and Louise Brooks of Allsop LLP being Receivers appointed under the Law of Property Act 1925)
• Kanhai v Gosine

FOLLOWED in

• Cheong Lep Keen and Another v Tan Tin Kek
• Cheong Lep Keen and Another; Lee Ah Low
• Cheng Hang Guan v Perumahan Farlim (Penang) Sdn Bhd

REFERRED in

• Syarikat Rani's v Zain Building Property Development Company Ltd
• Burke v Bucher

CITED in

• Metcalfe & Eddy Ltd v Edghill
• Funderannu and Others v Minors
• Minors v Funderannu and Others

This document cites

---

• Bank of Victoria v McHutchison, (1881)
• COVERED MARKETS, Ltd v GREEN
• Ladies' Hosiery and Underwear Ltd v Parker
• Adler v Blackman