Aamir Mazhar v The Lord Chancellor

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Simms
• B. (A Minor) v DPP

REFERS TO

• Barratt v Ansell (t/a as Woolf Seddon); Arthur JS Hall & Company v Simons
• Wallersteiner v Moir
• B. (A Minor) v DPP

[See more]

• O'Reilly v Mackman
• O'Reilly v Mackman
• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Simms
• Re SA (Vulnerable Adult with Capacity: Marriage)
• Animatrix Ltd v O'Kelly
• R (Morgan Grenfell & Company Ltd) v Special Commissioner of Income Tax
• Pepper (Inspector of Taxes) v Hart
• Forresters Ketley v Brent and Another
• Re McC. (A Minor)
• Webster v Lord Chancellor
• Re Racal Communications Ltd
• LL (Appellant / Claimant) v The Lord Chancellor (Respondent / Defendant)
• Sirros v Moore
• Hinds v Liverpool County Court and Others
• R v Rezvi
• R (KB) v Mental Health Review Tribunal (Damages)
• Between William Richard Pole Tylney Long Wellesley, James Fitzroy Henry William Pole Tylney long Wellesley, and Victoria Catherine Mary Pole Tylney Long Wellesley, Infants, under the Age of Twenty-one Years, by the Honourable Philip Pusey, their next Friend, plaintiffs, and Charles Henry Duke of Beaufort and Others, Defendants. Nov. 5, 7, 9, 1825; Feb. 21, 24, Mar. 17, 18, 21, April 18, 1826; Jan. 16, 17, 18, 22, 25, 27, 29, Feb. 1, 1827
• R (Faulkner) v Secretary of State for Justice

CONSIDERS

• Constitutional Reform Act 2005 - Articles : S-3
• Mental Capacity Act 2005
• Courts Act 2003 - Articles : S-75

[See more]

• Human Rights Act 1998
• Human Rights Act 1998 - Articles : S-6
• Human Rights Act 1998 - Articles : S-7
• Human Rights Act 1998 - Articles : S-8
• Human Rights Act 1998 - Articles : S-9
• Crown Proceedings Act 1947 - Articles : S-2
• Human Rights Act 1998 (Jurisdiction) (Scotland) Rules 2000
• Human Rights Act 1998
• Mental Capacity Act 2005

REFERRED in

• James Patrick Power v Maria Eugenia Vidal
• Mazhar v Birmingham Community Healthcare Foundation NHS Trust and Others
• UXA v Merseycare NHS Foundation Trust

CONSIDERED in

• James Patrick Power v Maria Eugenia Vidal
• UXA v Merseycare NHS Foundation Trust
• MTA v The Lord Chancellor

[See more]

• R Melanie Woolcock v The Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government

APPEAL RESOLVED in

• Aamir Mazhar v The Lord Chancellor

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2018] 2 WLR 1304
• [2018] FAM 257

This document cites

• Convenio Europeo para la Protección de los Derechos Humanos y de las Libertades Fundamentales
• Nelles v. Ontario et al., (1989) 98 N.R. 321 (SCC)
• O'Reilly v Mackman
• Forresters Ketley v Brent and Another
• Animatrix Ltd v O'Kelly



See all quotations

• R (Morgan Grenfell & Company Ltd) v Special Commissioner of Income Tax
• Barratt v Ansell (t/a as Woolf Seddon); Arthur JS Hall & Company v Simons
• O'Reilly v Mackman
• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Simms
• B. (A Minor) v DPP
• B. (A Minor) v DPP
• LL (Appellant / Claimant) v The Lord Chancellor (Respondent / Defendant)
• FM (A Child) v Singer
• Pepper (Inspector of Taxes) v Hart
• Wallersteiner v Moir
• Re Racal Communications Ltd
• R (KB) v Mental Health Review Tribunal (Damages)
• Webster v Lord Chancellor
• R v Rezvi
• Re SA (Vulnerable Adult with Capacity: Marriage)
• Hinds v Liverpool County Court and Others
• Re McC. (A Minor)
• Between William Richard Pole Tylney Long Wellesley, James Fitzroy Henry William Pole Tylney long Wellesley, and Victoria Catherine Mary Pole Tylney Long Wellesley, Infants, under the Age of Twenty-one Years, by the Honourable Philip Pusey, their next Friend, plaintiffs, and Charles Henry Duke of Beaufort and Others, Defendants. Nov. 5, 7, 9, 1825; Feb. 21, 24, Mar. 17, 18, 21, April 18, 1826; Jan. 16, 17, 18, 22, 25, 27, 29, Feb. 1, 1827
• Sirros v Moore
• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Simms
• Courts Act 2003
• Mental Capacity Act 2005
• Crown Proceedings Act 1947
• Human Rights Act 1998 (Jurisdiction) (Scotland) Rules 2000
• Civil Procedure Rules 1998
• The Family Procedure Rules 2010
• R (Faulkner) v Secretary of State for Justice
• Autologic Holdings Plc and Others v Commissioners of Inland Revenue; Test Claimants in Loss Relief Group Litigation v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
• Human Rights Act 1998
• Federal Cases - Pulliam v. Allen, 82-1432