992 P.2d 534 (Wash.App. Div. 1 2000), 41882-3, Caswell v. Pierce County

Citation: 992 P.2d 534, 99 Wn.App. 194

Opinion Judge: GROSSE

Party Name: Martin CASWELL and Barbara Caswell, husband and wife, Respondents, v. PIERCE COUNTY and Fir Grove Partnership, Appellants.

Attorney: Jill Guernsey, Pierce County Prosecutors Office, Tacoma, Eileen M. McKain, Pierce County Deputy Prosecuting Atty, Port Orchard, William T. Lynn, Margaret Y. Archer, Gordon Thomas Honeywell Etal, Tacoma, for Appellant(s)., Michael W. Gendle, Bricklin & Gendler, Seattle, for Respondent(s).

Case Date: January 31, 2000

Court: Washington Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

992 P.2d 534 (Wash.App. Div. 1 2000), 41882-3, Caswell v. Pierce County

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Washington - 759 P.2d 1188 (Wash. 1988), 52997-3, Honcoop v. State
Washington - 974 P.2d 863 (Wash.App. Div. 1 1999), 41281-7, Association of Rural Residents v. Kitsap County
Washington - 979 P.2d 374 (Wash. 1999), 66904-0, King County v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings Bd.
Washington - 992 P.2d 541 (Wash.App. Div. 1 2000), 42629-0, State v. Soonalole