99 S.E.2d 905 (Ga. 1957), 19759, Miller v. Coleman

Citation: 99 S.E.2d 905, 213 Ga. 460

Opinion Judge: HEAD, Justice.

Party Name: Henry B. MILLER et al. v. S. M. COLEMAN et al.

Attorney: A verdict was returned for the plaintiffs, and a decree enjoining the maintenance of an alleged nuisance by the defendants (the present plaintiffs in error) was duly entered. Their motion for a new trial was overruled, and that judgment was affirmed by this court. Miller v. Coleman, 213 Ga. 125, ...

Case Date: Friday September 06, 1957

Court: Georgia Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

99 S.E.2d 905 (Ga. 1957), 19759, Miller v. Coleman

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Georgia - 121 S.E. 317 (Ga. 1924), 3699, Barber v. Barber
Georgia - 21 S.E.2d 866 (Ga.App. 1942), 29682, Bond v. State
Georgia - 21 S.E.2d 86 (Ga. 1942), 14170, City of Atlanta v. Carroll
Georgia - 4 S.E.2d 28 (Ga. 1939), 12821, Palmer v. Jackson
Georgia - 44 S.E.2d 260 (Ga. 1947), 15903, Ballard v. Harmon

See all quotations