99 N.E. 989 (Ind. 1912), 22,107, Fox v. Barekman

Citation: 99 N.E. 989, 178 Ind. 572

Opinion Judge: Monks, C. J.

Party Name: Fox v. Barekman

Attorney: A. T. Cobb, Cullop & Shaw, Padgett & Padgett, for appellant. John Wilhelm Sherman, G. Davenport, William R. Gardiner, Clint K. Tharp and Charles G. Gardiner, for appellee.

Case Date: Tuesday November 26, 1912

Court: Indiana Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

99 N.E. 989 (Ind. 1912), 22,107, Fox v. Barekman

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Indiana - 70 Ind. 569 (Ind. 1880), , Pennsylvania Co. v. Hensil
Indiana - 16 N.E. 121 (Ind. 1888), 13,003, Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Company v. Barnhart
Indiana - 59 N.E. 414 (Ind.App. 1901), 3,351, Heintz v. Mueller
Indiana - 64 N.E. 463 (Ind. 1902), 19,836, Fifer v. Ritter
Indiana - 64 N.E. 610 (Ind. 1902), 19,580, Monteith v. Kokomo Wood Enameling Co.

See all quotations