99 Cal.App.3d 665, 17946, Bakman v. Department of Transportation

Citation: 99 Cal.App.3d 665, 160 Cal.Rptr. 583

Opinion Judge: [11] Warren

Party Name: Bakman v. Department of Transportation

Attorney: [7] Fadem, Berger & Norton, Lerrigo, Thuesen, Walters, Nibler & Hedrick, William Stocker and Michael M. Berger for Plaintiffs and Appellants. [8] Richard G. Rypinski, John B. Matheny, Edward J. Connor, Jr., and Mark F. Mispagel for Defendant and Respondent. [9] James McKelvey, City Attorney, Hoge...

Case Date: Wednesday December 12, 1979

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

99 Cal.App.3d 665, 17946, Bakman v. Department of Transportation

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 58 Cal.2d 479, 21109, Siller v. Board of Sup'rs of City and County of San Francisco
California - 11 Cal.3d 28, 30009, Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.
California - 11 Cal.3d 506, 30139, Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Community v. County of Los Angeles
California - 4 Cal.3d 130, 29689, Bixby v. Pierno
California - 255 Cal.App.2d 241, 8302, Lucas v. Hesperia Golf and Country Club

See all quotations