99 Cal.App.2d 496, 14501, Meadows v. Emett & Chandler

Citation: 99 Cal.App.2d 496, 222 P.2d 145

Opinion Judge: [10] Nourse

Party Name: Meadows v. Emett & Chandler

Attorney: [7] Cosgrove, Cramer, Diether & Rindge and Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison for Appellants. [8] William E. Ferriter and James C. Purcell for Respondent.

Case Date: Tuesday September 19, 1950

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

99 Cal.App.2d 496, 14501, Meadows v. Emett & Chandler

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 187 Cal. 7, L. A. 5921, Erkenbrecher v. Grant
California - 192 Cal. 256, L. A. 7729, Sheeley v. Jones
California - 208 Cal. 228, L. A. 10057, Continental Securities and Investment Co. v. Rawson
California - 217 Cal. 124, L. A. 12102, Hollywood Cleaning & Pressing Co. v. Hollywood Laundry Service
California - 17 Cal.2d 690, 15971, Wiseman v. Sierra Highland Min. Co.

See all quotations

99 Cal.App.2d 496, 14501, Meadows v. Emett &amp; Chandler

99 Cal.App.2d 496, 14501, Meadows v. Emett & Chandler