97 A.2d 687 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1953), A-301, Harrison v. Stanton

Citation: 97 A.2d 687, 26 N.J.Super. 194

Opinion Judge: JAYNE, J.A.D.

Party Name: HARRISON v. STANTON.

Attorney: John H. Yauch, Jr., Newark, argued the cause for appellant (Gilhooly, Yauch & Fagan, Newark, attorneys). Arthur F. Mead, Newark, argued the cause for respondent (Cox & Walburg, Newark, attorneys).

Judge Panel: Before Judges EASTWOOD, BIGELOW, and JAYNE.

Case Date: Friday June 12, 1953

Court: New Jersey Superior Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

97 A.2d 687 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1953), A-301, Harrison v. Stanton

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Massachusetts - 330 Mass. 1 (1953), Moore's Case
New Jersey - 26 A.2d 730 (N.J. 1942), 241, Ferragino v. McCue's Dairy
New Jersey - 77 A.2d 467 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1950), No. A--498, Kelly v. Hackensack Water Co.
New Jersey - 92 A.2d 506 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1952), No. A--456, Kelly v. Hackensack Water Co.
New Jersey - 97 A.2d 732 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1953), A-162, Marano v. Sabbio