95 S.W.2d 122 (Tex.Crim.App. 1936), 18358, Speckels v. State

Citation: 95 S.W.2d 122, 130 Tex.Crim. 639

Opinion Judge: [130 Tex.Crim. 640] KRUEGER, Judge. PER CURIAM.

Party Name: SPECKELS v. STATE.

Attorney: Polk Shelton and Emmett Shelton, both of Austin, for appellant. James P. Hart, Dist. Atty., E. G. Moorhead and W. K. Miller, Asst. Dist. Attys., and Lloyd W. Davidson, State's Atty., all of Austin, for the State.

Case Date: May 20, 1936

Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

95 S.W.2d 122 (Tex.Crim.App. 1936), 18358, Speckels v. State

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Texas - 138 S.W. 604 (Tex.Crim.App. 1911), Brown v. State
Texas - 37 S.W.2d 1024 (Tex.Crim.App. 1931), 13991, De Blanc v. State
Texas - 39 S.W.2d 62 (Tex.Crim.App. 1931), 14127, Contreras v. State
Texas - 62 S.W.2d 146 (Tex.Crim.App. 1933), 15948, Sherman v. State
Texas - 69 S.W.2d 104 (Tex.Crim.App. 1934), 16294, Hoovel v. State

See all quotations