942 A.2d 396 (Conn. 2008), 17844, Harpaz v. Laidlaw Transit, Inc.

Citation: 942 A.2d 396, 286 Conn. 102

Opinion Judge: KATZ, J.

Party Name: David HARPAZ v. LAIDLAW TRANSIT, INC., et al.[1]

Attorney: Philip F. Spillane, New Milford, for the appellant (plaintiff). Erik S. Bartlett, for the appellees (defendants). Philip F. Spillane, for the appellant (plaintiff)., Erik S. Bartlett, for the appellees (defendants).

Judge Panel: NORCOTT, KATZ, PALMER, VERTEFEUILLE and SCHALLER, Js.

Case Date: March 18, 2008

Court: Connecticut Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

942 A.2d 396 (Conn. 2008), 17844, Harpaz v. Laidlaw Transit, Inc.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 502 U.S. 1095 (1992), 91-988, Finley v. Hoechst Celanese Corp.
Connecticut - 291 A.2d 743 (Conn. 1972), Murchison v. Skinner Precision Industries, Inc.
Connecticut - 334 A.2d 452 (Conn. 1973), Menzies v. Fisher
Connecticut - 411 A.2d 924 (Conn. 1979), Adzima v. UAC/Norden Division
Connecticut - 479 A.2d 820 (Conn.App. 1984), Bush v. Quality Bakers of America

See all quotations