94 S.W.2d 752 (Tex.Crim.App. 1936), 17834, Huntress v. State

Citation: 94 S.W.2d 752, 130 Tex.Crim. 492

Opinion Judge: CHRISTIAN, Judge. PER CURIAM.

Party Name: HUNTRESS v. STATE.

Attorney: D. A. McAskill, T. J. Newton, Van Henry Archer, Forrest Bennett, and Dave Watson, all of San Antonio, for appellant. John R. Shook, Crim. Dist. Atty., Paul J. Kilday, First Asst. Crim. Dist. Atty., L. J. Gittinger and Leroy Jeffers, Asst. Crim. Dist. Attys., all of San Antonio, and Lloyd W. David...

Case Date: Wednesday January 22, 1936

Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

94 S.W.2d 752 (Tex.Crim.App. 1936), 17834, Huntress v. State

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Texas - 248 S.W. 389 (Tex.Crim.App. 1923), 7234, Lankford v. State
Texas - 18 S.W.2d 1081 (Tex.Crim.App. 1929), 12629, Haynes v. State
Texas - 60 S.W.2d 436 (Tex.Crim.App. 1933), 15735, Benavides v. State
Texas - 7 S.W.2d 96 (Tex.Crim.App. 1928), 11659, Dooley v. State
Texas - 77 S.W.2d 528 (Tex.Crim.App. 1934), 16932, Nami v. State

See all quotations