94 S.E. 107 (N.C. 1917), 389, McRary v. Southern Ry. Co.

Citation: 94 S.E. 107, 174 N.C. 563

Opinion Judge: HOKE, J.

Party Name: MCRARY ET AL. v. SOUTHERN RY. CO.

Attorney: Walser & Walser, of Lexington, and Linn & Linn, of Salisburg, for appellant. Phillips & Bower and Raper & Raper, all of Lexington, for appellees.

Case Date: November 14, 1917

Court: North Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

94 S.E. 107 (N.C. 1917), 389, McRary v. Southern Ry. Co.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 202 U.S. 242 (1906), 233, Texas and Pacific Railway Company v. Mugg
Federal Cases - 243 U.S. 592 (2006), St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Company v. Starbird
North Carolina - 79 S.E. 433 (N.C. 1913), Smith v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.
North Carolina - 79 S.E. 977 (N.C. 1913), In re Smith's Will
North Carolina - 82 S.E. 1 (N.C. 1914), 57, Virginia-Carolina Peanut Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.

See all quotations