94 Cal.App.4th 197, H021077, Kamen v. Lindly

Citation: 94 Cal.App.4th 197, 114 Cal.Rptr.2d 127

Opinion Judge: [8] The opinion of the court was delivered by: Mihara, J.

Party Name: Kamen v. Lindly

Attorney: [7] Attorneys for Plaintiffs: William S. Lerach, William S. Dato, Tor Gronborg, Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach. Robert M. Roseman, Spector Roseman & Kodroff. Attorneys for Respondent Deloitte & Touche: Dale E. Barnes, Jr., Karen L. Kennard, Jennifer L. Jonak, McCUTCHEN Doyle Brown & Enersen...

Case Date: Wednesday December 05, 2001

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

94 Cal.App.4th 197, H021077, Kamen v. Lindly

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 285 F.Supp. 758 (S.D.N.Y. 1966), 66 Civ. 2367, Robbins v. Banner Industries, Inc.
Federal Cases - 242 F.3d 191 (4th Cir. 2001), 00-1577, Dellastatious v. Williams
Federal Cases - 582 F.Supp. 1110 (D.Del. 1984), Civ. A. 84-75, Gulf Corp. v. Mesa Petroleum Co.
Federal Cases - 228 F.3d 1057 (9th Cir. 2000), 98-17324, Howard v. Everex Sys., Inc.
Federal Cases - 565 F.Supp. 615 (N.D.Cal. 1983), C-81-1737, Hudson v. Capital Management Intern., Inc.

See all quotations