93 S.E.2d 900 (S.C. 1956), 17186, State v. Byrd

Citation: 93 S.E.2d 900, 229 S.C. 593

Opinion Judge: OXNER, Justice.

Party Name: The STATE, Respondent, v. Harold BYRD, Appellant.

Attorney: Messrs. Horace L. Bomar, James B. Stephen and Roy M. Smith, of Spartanburg, for Appellant, cite: As to rule that a Trial Judge's ruling on a motion for change of venue, as well as on a motion for a continuance, will not be disturbed except upon a showing of abuse of discretion: 160 S.C. 420, 158 ...

Case Date: Thursday July 12, 1956

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

93 S.E.2d 900 (S.C. 1956), 17186, State v. Byrd

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

South Carolina - 119 S.E. 776 (S.C. 1922), 10979, Sandel v. State
South Carolina - 174 S.E. 911 (S.C. 1934), 13864, Stack v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America
South Carolina - 32 S.E.2d 163 (S.C. 1944), 15690, State v. Gilstrap
South Carolina - 64 S.E.2d 130 (S.C. 1951), 16479, State v. Gardner
South Carolina - 76 S.E.2d 674 (S.C. 1953), 16747, State v. Gantt

See all quotations