93 S.E.2d 645 (S.C. 1956), 17183, Watson v. Little

Citation: 93 S.E.2d 645, 229 S.C. 486

Opinion Judge: T. B. GRENEKER, Acting Associate Justice.

Party Name: William D. WATSON, Annie W. Eustler, Nan DeLoach Thurman, Margaret Thurman Wannamaker, Respondents, and Eva R. Watson, Carl B. Watson, Edwin R. Watson, Roderick B. Watson, T. B. Watson, Jr., John C. Watson, Respondents-Appellants, v. Lila Watson LITTLE, Appellant-Respondent.

Attorney: Messrs. Leppard & Leppard of Chesterfield, and A. L. Hardee and W. T. McGowan, Jr., of Florence, for Appellant-Respondent, cite: As to ledger account not being properly identified and therefore inadmissible in evidence: 20 Am. Jur. 920, 921, 934; 20 S. C. L. (2 Hill) 584; 37 S. C. L. (3 Rich.) 35...

Case Date: July 10, 1956

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

93 S.E.2d 645 (S.C. 1956), 17183, Watson v. Little

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

South Carolina - 44 S.E.2d 611 (S.C. 1947), 16000, Anderson v. Purvis
South Carolina - 51 S.E.2d 753 (S.C. 1949), 16180, Ham v. Flowers
South Carolina - 63 S.E.2d 459 (S.C. 1951), 16463, Archambault v. Sprouse
South Carolina - 77 S.E.2d 212 (S.C. 1953), 16769, Newton v. Batson
South Carolina - 79 S.E.2d 384 (S.C. 1953), 16806, Watson v. Little

See all quotations