93 S.E.2d 362 (Ga.App. 1956), 36241, Martin v. State

Citation: 93 S.E.2d 362, 94 Ga.App. 53

Opinion Judge: TOWNSEND, Judge.

Party Name: Allen MARTIN v. The STATE.

Attorney: The evidence upon which this conviction was procured being purely circumstantial, and failing to exclude every other reasonable hypothesis save that of the guilt of the accused, is insufficient to support the verdict., Allen Martin was tried and convicted in the City Court of Jefferson, of having...

Judge Panel: GARDNER, P. J., and CARLISLE, J., concur.

Case Date: June 12, 1956

Court: Georgia Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

93 S.E.2d 362 (Ga.App. 1956), 36241, Martin v. State

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Georgia - 68 S.E. 619 (Ga.App. 1910), 2,692, Fain v. City of Atlanta
Georgia - 69 S.E. 578 (Ga.App. 1910), 2,805, Cain v. City of Cordele
Georgia - 78 S.E. 472 (Ga.App. 1913), 4,903, Smith v. City of Atlanta
Georgia - 63 S.E.2d 689 (Ga.App. 1951), 33302, Easterwood v. State
Georgia - 93 S.E.2d 669 (Ga.App. 1956), 36164, Collis v. Ashe