93 N.W. 1118 (Wis. 1903), Francisco v. Hatch

Citation: 93 N.W. 1118, 117 Wis. 242

Opinion Judge: WINSLOW, J.

Party Name: FRANCISCO, Respondent, v. HATCH, imp., Appellant

Attorney: For the appellant there was a brief by R. E. Noyes, and oral argument by Rufus B. Smith. For the respondent there was a brief by E. F. Dithmar and Grotophorst, Evans & Thomas, and oral argument by E. A. Evans, H. H. Thomas, and E. F. Dithmar.

Case Date: Saturday March 21, 1903

Court: Wisconsin Supreme Court