92 S.E. 465 (S.C. 1917), 9681, Erskine v. Erskine

Citation: 92 S.E. 465, 107 S.C. 233

Opinion Judge: HYDRICK, J.

Party Name: ERSKINE v. ERSKINE ET AL.

Attorney: Greene & Earle and Bonham, Watkins & Allen, all of Anderson, for appellant. Ernest F. Cochran and Watkins & Prince, all of Anderson, for respondents.

Case Date: Thursday May 17, 1917

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

92 S.E. 465 (S.C. 1917), 9681, Erskine v. Erskine

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

South Carolina - 22 S.C. 454 (S.C. 1885), McKeegan v. O'Neill
South Carolina - 31 S.E. 304 (S.C. 1898), Latimer v. Latimer
South Carolina - 34 S.E. 405 (S.C. 1899), Alexander v. McDaniel
South Carolina - 36 S.E. 546 (S.C. 1900), Lavender v. Daniel
South Carolina - 52 S.E. 49 (S.C. 1905), Whitman v. Corley

See all quotations