92 P.2d 612 (Okla.Crim.App. 1939), A-9541, Roberts v. State

Citation: 92 P.2d 612, 66 Okla.Crim. 371

Opinion Judge: BAREFOOT, Judge.

Party Name: ROBERTS v. STATE.

Attorney: Frank Hickman, of Tulsa, and Smith & Siler, of Oklahoma City, for plaintiff in error. Mac I. Williamson, Atty. Gen. and Dixie Gilmer, Co. Atty., of Tulsa, for the State.

Case Date: Friday June 30, 1939

Court: Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

92 P.2d 612 (Okla.Crim.App. 1939), A-9541, Roberts v. State

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Oklahoma - 250 P. 544 (Okla.Crim.App. 1926), A-5269, Perkins v. State
Oklahoma - 16 P.2d 267 (Okla.Crim.App. 1932), A-8409, Fisher v. State
Oklahoma - 89 P.2d 970 (Okla.Crim.App. 1939), A-9480, Symonds v. State
Oklahoma - 89 P.2d 979 (Okla.Crim.App. 1939), A-9541, Roberts v. State
South Dakota - 91 N.W. 313 (S.D. 1902), State v. Page