92 Cal.App.4th 994, A090680, Birschtein v. New United Motor Manufacturing, Inc.

Citation: 92 Cal.App.4th 994, 112 Cal.Rptr.2d 347

Opinion Judge: [8] The opinion of the court was delivered by: Kay, J.

Party Name: Birschtein v. New United Motor Manufacturing, Inc.

Attorney: [7] Counsel for Appellant: Stephen M. Fuerch Bryce C. Anderson. Counsel for Respondent Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker Llp Paul W. Cane, Jr. Rosemary M. Kirbach Heather A. Morgan.

Case Date: October 09, 2001

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

92 Cal.App.4th 994, A090680, Birschtein v. New United Motor Manufacturing, Inc.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 444 F.2d 1186 (7th Cir. 1971), 18724, Bartmess v. Drewrys United StatesA., Inc.
Federal Cases - 842 F.2d 1010 (8th Cir. 1988), 87-1900, Hall v. Gus Const. Co., Inc.
Federal Cases - 895 F.2d 1469 (3rd Cir. 1990), 89-1207, Andrews v. City of Philadelphia
Federal Cases - 5 F.3d 279 (7th Cir. 1993), 93-1349, Moskowitz v. Trustees of Purdue University
Federal Cases - 715 F.2d 971 (5th Cir. 1983), 82-3198, Berry v. Board of Sup'rs of L.S.U.

See all quotations