91 S.E.2d 276 (S.C. 1956), 17112, Wynn v. Rood

Citation: 91 S.E.2d 276, 228 S.C. 577

Opinion Judge: OXNER, Justice.

Party Name: Robert B. WYNN, Respondent, v. H. Ray ROOD and Bernard Hunsinger, Appellants.

Attorney: Messrs. Leatherwood, Walker, Todd & Mann, of Greenville, for Appellants, cite: As to injection of possible criminal charge against driver-defendant, even by inference, being highly prejudicial and grounds for mistrial: 92 S.C. 236, 75 S.E. 533; 125 S.C. 442, 118 S.E. 802. As to Respondent being g...

Case Date: Tuesday January 31, 1956

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

91 S.E.2d 276 (S.C. 1956), 17112, Wynn v. Rood

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

South Carolina - 162 S.E. 596 (S.C. 1932), 13348, Coney v. Cox
South Carolina - 13 S.E.2d 137 (S.C. 1941), 15209, Harrison v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.
South Carolina - 50 S.E.2d 202 (S.C. 1948), 16143, Gordon v. Rothberg
South Carolina - 52 S.E.2d 403 (S.C. 1949), 16197, McCrae v. McCoy
South Carolina - 53 S.E.2d 60 (S.C. 1949), 16203, Haselden v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.

See all quotations