91 A.2d 497 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1952), No. A--517, City of Newark v. Martin

Citation: 91 A.2d 497, 22 N.J.Super. 32

Opinion Judge: Goldmann, J.A.D.

Party Name: THE CITY OF NEWARK, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. JOHN V. MARTIN, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT

Attorney: Mr. Michael Breitkopf argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant (Mr. Charles Handler, Corporation Counsel of the City of Newark, attorney; Mr. Joseph A. Ward, on the brief). Mr. Ralph G. Mesce argued the cause for the defendant-respondent (Messrs. Carl & Wm. Abruzzese and Mr. Ralph G. Mesce, attor...

Judge Panel: Eastwood, Goldmann and Francis.

Case Date: Tuesday October 07, 1952

Court: New Jersey Superior Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

91 A.2d 497 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1952), No. A--517, City of Newark v. Martin

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Illinois - 13 N.E.2d 987 (Ill. 1938), 24288, City of Chicago v. Ben Alpert, Inc.
New Jersey - 142 A. 557 (N.J. 1928), 288, Northern New Jersey Oil Company v. Board of Adjustment of The City of Newark
Missouri - 95 S.W.2d 837 (Mo.App. 1936), Rhodes v. A. Moll Grocer Co.
New Jersey - 88 A.2d 362 (N.J.Super. 1952), No. 7769 Misc, The City of Newark v. Martin
New York - 174 A.D. 813, Beach v. Jenkins

See all quotations