91 A.2d 441 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1952), No. A--417, Borgia v. Board of Review

Citation: 91 A.2d 441, 21 N.J.Super. 462

Opinion Judge: Eastwood, S.J.A.D.

Party Name: LUCILLE P. BORGIA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY ET ALS., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS

Attorney: Mr. Louis A. Finklestein argued the cause for the plaintiff-appellant. Mr. Clarence F. McGovern argued the cause for the defendants-respondents.

Judge Panel: Eastwood, Goldmann and Francis.

Case Date: September 26, 1952

Court: New Jersey Superior Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

91 A.2d 441 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1952), No. A--417, Borgia v. Board of Review

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 314 U.S. 632 (1941), 116, Pennsylvania Railroad Company v. Mistrot
Arizona - 109 P.2d 41 (Ariz. 1941), Civ. 4264, Consolidated Motors, Inc. v. Skousen
New Jersey - 162 A. 732 (N.J.L. 1932), 34, Cook v. Phillips
New Jersey - 70 A.2d 750 (N.J. 1950), No. A--61, Andricsak v. National Fireproofing Corp.
New Jersey - 71 A.2d 624 (N.J. 1950), No. A--70, Handlon v. Town of Belleville

See all quotations