901 A.2d 1269 (Conn.App. 2006), 25598, Pinette v. McLaughlin

Citation: 901 A.2d 1269, 96 Conn.App. 769

Opinion Judge: STOUGHTON, J.

Party Name: Deanna PINETTE v. Casey E. McLAUGHLIN et al.

Attorney: Max F. Brunswick, with whom, on the brief, was Maura L. McInnis, for the appellant (plaintiff)., James E. Kernan, Southbury, for the appellees (defendants)., SCHALLER, HARPER and STOUGHTON, Js. Max F. Brunswick, with whom, on the brief, was Maura L. McInnis, for the appellant (plaintiff). James ...

Judge Panel: SCHALLER, HARPER and STOUGHTON, Js. In this opinion the other Judges concurred.

Case Date: August 01, 2006

Court: Connecticut Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

901 A.2d 1269 (Conn.App. 2006), 25598, Pinette v. McLaughlin

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Illinois - 438 N.E.2d 546 (Ill.App. 1 Dist. 1982), 81-1530, Dial v. Mihalic
Connecticut - 464 A.2d 847 (Conn. 1983), Conaway v. Prestia
Connecticut - 663 A.2d 1001 (Conn. 1995), 15051, Home Ins. Co. v. Aetna Life and Cas. Co.
Connecticut - 711 A.2d 778 (Conn.Super. 1998), CV98040784, Simms v. Candela
Connecticut - 757 A.2d 1207 (Conn.App. 2000), 18356, Muniz v. Kravis

See all quotations