90 S.W.2d 1090 (Tex.Com.App. 1936), 1951-6580, Hough v. Grapotte

Citation: 90 S.W.2d 1090, 127 Tex. 144

Opinion Judge: HICKMAN, Commissioner.

Party Name: HOUGH v. GRAPOTTE.

Attorney: Dodson & Ezelle and Chas. W. Duke, all of San Antonio, for plaintiff in error. [127 Tex. 145] Arnold & Cozby, of San Antonio, for defendant in error.

Case Date: March 04, 1936

Court: Court of Commission of Appeals of Texas

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

90 S.W.2d 1090 (Tex.Com.App. 1936), 1951-6580, Hough v. Grapotte

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Texas - 266 S.W. 502 (Tex.Com.App. 1924), 594-4067, Connellee v. Nees
Texas - 298 S.W. 542 (Tex.App. - Section B </B><SUP>[<A href=#FN1 name="ftn.FN1">1</A>]</SUP><B>st Dist.] 1927), 816-4849., Texas Emp. Ins. Ass'n v. Owen
Texas - 22 S.W.2d 1080 (Tex.Civ.App. 1929), 869, Arendale v. Arendale
Texas - 59 S.W.2d 886 (Tex.Civ.App. 1933), 9045, Hough v. Grapotte