9 Cal.App.3d 402, 26646, Kimmel v. Keefe

Citation: 9 Cal.App.3d 402, 88 Cal.Rptr. 47

Opinion Judge: [10] Elkington

Party Name: Kimmel v. Keefe

Attorney: [7] Quantz & Tanner and Charles J. Quantz for Defendant and Appellant. [8] Berlin, O'Grady, Doll & Goodman, Sidney L. Berlin and Fred R. Brinkop for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Case Date: Monday July 06, 1970

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

9 Cal.App.3d 402, 26646, Kimmel v. Keefe

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 33 Cal.2d 402, 20687, Guerin v. Kirst
California - 41 Cal.2d 414, 22650, Schlothan v. Rusalem
California - 66 Cal.2d 782, 28012, Green Trees Enterprises, Inc. v. Palm Springs Alpine Estates, Inc.
California - 103 Cal.App. 490, Civ. 3981, Morel v. Simonian
California - 118 Cal.App. 561, Civ. 8043, Martin v. Hollins

See all quotations