9 Cal.4th 552, S041217, Fitch v. Commission on Judicial Performance

Citation: 9 Cal.4th 552, 37 Cal.Rptr.2d 581, 887 P.2d 937

Opinion Judge: [9] The Court

Party Name: Fitch v. Commission on Judicial Performance

Attorney: [6] John Fitch, in pro. per., and William A. Smith for Petitioner. [7] Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, Karen Ziskind and Raymond L. Brosterhous, Deputy Attorneys General, for Respondent.

Case Date: February 09, 1995

Court: California Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

9 Cal.4th 552, S041217, Fitch v. Commission on Judicial Performance

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 10 Cal.3d 270, 30058, Geiler v. Commission On Judicial Qualifications
California - 13 Cal.3d 778, 23153, Spruance v. Commission On Judicial Qualifications
California - 29 Cal.3d 615, 24135, Wenger v. Commission On Judicial Performance
California - 37 Cal.3d 27, 31751, Gubler v. Commission On Judicial Performance
California - 40 Cal.3d 473, 24815, Mardikian v. Commission On Judicial Performance

See all quotations