899 A.2d 666 (Conn.App. 2006), 26691, Robert v. Scarlata

Citation: 899 A.2d 666, 96 Conn.App. 19

Opinion Judge: FLYNN, C.J.

Party Name: Paul ROBERT v. Carmen SCARLATA et al.

Attorney: Paul Robert, pro se, the appellant (plaintiff)., Jonathan A. Kaplan, with whom was Donald E. Weisman, Hartford, for the appellees (defendants)., FLYNN, C.J., and ROGERS and HENNESSY, Js. Paul Robert, pro se, the appellant (plaintiff). Jonathan A. Kaplan, with whom was Donald E. Weisman, for the ...

Judge Panel: FLYNN, C.J., and ROGERS and HENNESSY, Js. In this opinion the other Judges concurred.

Case Date: June 13, 2006

Court: Connecticut Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

899 A.2d 666 (Conn.App. 2006), 26691, Robert v. Scarlata

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Connecticut - 59 A. 491 (Conn. 1904), Vincent Bros. v. New York, N.H. & H.R. Co.
Connecticut - 846 A.2d 909 (Conn.App. 2004), 24352, Motherway v. Geary
Connecticut - 867 A.2d 860 (Conn.App. 2005), 24618, Stohlts v. Gilkinson
Connecticut - 890 A.2d 1287 (Conn. 2006), 17439, Right v. Breen
Connecticut - 898 A.2d 838 (Conn.App. 2006), 26263, Boyd v. Commissioner of Correction