897 A.2d 733 (Conn.App. 2006), 26218, State v. Roy D.

Citation: 897 A.2d 733, 95 Conn.App. 686

Opinion Judge: BISHOP, J.

Party Name: STATE of Connecticut v. ROY D. [1]

Attorney: Michael Zariphes, special public defender, for the appellant (defendant)., Michele C. Lukban, senior assistant state's attorney, with whom, on the brief, were Matthew C. Gedansky, state's attorney, and Elizabeth C. Learning, assistant state's attorney, for the appellee (state)., BISHOP, DiPENTIMA...

Judge Panel: BISHOP, DiPENTIMA and FOTI, Js. In this opinion the other Judges concurred.

Case Date: May 30, 2006

Court: Connecticut Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

897 A.2d 733 (Conn.App. 2006), 26218, State v. Roy D.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 471 U.S. 606 (1985), 84-465, Black v. Romano
Federal Cases - 400 U.S. 25 (1970), 14, North Carolina v. Alford
Connecticut - 540 A.2d 679 (Conn. 1988), 13116, State v. Smith
Connecticut - 751 A.2d 420 (Conn.App. 2000), 18807, State v. Cyr
Connecticut - 842 A.2d 567 (Conn. 2004), 16827, State v. Faraday

See all quotations