893 A.2d 486 (Conn.App. 2006), 26461, Heussner v. Day, Berry and Howard, LLP

Citation: 893 A.2d 486, 94 Conn.App. 569

Opinion Judge: McLACHLAN, J.

Party Name: Janet HEUSSNER v. DAY, BERRY AND HOWARD, LLP, et al.

Attorney: John R. Williams, New Haven, for the appellant (plaintiff)., Anthony M. Fitzgerald, with whom, on the brief, was David S. Hardy, for the appellees (named defendant et al.)., DiPentima, McLachlan and Hennessy, Js. John R. Williams, for the appellant (plaintiff). Anthony M. Fitzgerald, with whom, ...

Judge Panel: DiPentima, McLachlan and Hennessy, Js. In this opinion the other Judges concurred.

Case Date: March 28, 2006

Court: Connecticut Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

893 A.2d 486 (Conn.App. 2006), 26461, Heussner v. Day, Berry and Howard, LLP

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Connecticut - 446 A.2d 815 (Conn. 1982), McHale v. W. B. S. Corp.
Connecticut - 597 A.2d 807 (Conn. 1991), 14267, DeLaurentis v. City of New Haven
Connecticut - 79 A.2d 769 (Conn. 1951), Zenik v. O'Brien
Connecticut - 804 A.2d 170 (Conn. 2002), 16648, Gaynor v. Payne
Connecticut - 830 A.2d 314 (Conn.App. 2003), 22858, Zanoni v. Lynch

See all quotations