892 A.2d 694 (N.J.Super.A.D. 2006), Rowe v. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc.

Citation: 892 A.2d 694, 383 N.J.Super. 442

Opinion Judge: The opinion of the court was delivered by WECKER, J.A.D.

Party Name: Robert ROWE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC., and Roche Laboratories Inc., Defendants-Respondents.

Attorney: Brian J. Molloy, Woodbridge, argued the cause for appellant (Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, attorneys; Mr. Molloy of counsel; Jeffrey J. Brookner and Mr. Molloy on the brief)., Paul W. Schmidt, Boonton, (Covington & Burling) of the Washington, D.C. bar, admitted pro hac vice, argued the cause for re...

Case Date: February 28, 2006

Court: New Jersey Superior Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

892 A.2d 694 (N.J.Super.A.D. 2006), Rowe v. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 788 F.2d 741 (11th Cir. 1986), 85-8683, Wells v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.
Federal Cases - 385 F.3d 961 (6th Cir. 2004), 03-1712, Garcia v. Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories
Federal Cases - 287 F.Supp.2d 968 (E.D.Wis. 2003), 03-C-421, Stupak v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc.
Federal Cases - 680 F.Supp. 1293 (D.Minn. 1988), Civ. 3-85-1599, Kociemba v. G.D. Searle & Co.
Federal Cases - 322 F.Supp.2d 848 (W.D.Mich. 2004), 5 03-CV-031, Ammend v. BioPort, Inc.

See all quotations