89 S.W.2d 360 (Tenn.Ct.App. 1935), Boyd v. Ducktown Chemical & Iron Co.

Citation: 89 S.W.2d 360, 19 Tenn.App. 392

Opinion Judge: DE WITT, Judge.

Party Name: BOYD ET AL. v. DUCKTOWN CHEMICAL & IRON CO. ET AL.

Attorney: Charles B. Witt, of Benton, and R. R. Kramer, of Knoxville, for complainants. D. Sullins Stuart, of Cleveland, and Miller, Miller & Martin, of Chattanooga, for defendants.

Case Date: June 15, 1935

Court: Tennessee Court of Appeals