89 S.E.2d 376 (S.C. 1955), 17069, Antrum v. Hartsville Production Credit Ass'n

Citation: 89 S.E.2d 376, 228 S.C. 201

Opinion Judge: LEGGE, Justice.

Party Name: Lide ANTRUM, Appellant, v. HARTSVILLE PRODUCTION CREDIT ASSOCIATION et al., Respondents.

Attorney: Messrs. H. F. Bell, of Chesterfield, and Benny R. Greer, of Darlington, for Appellant, cite: As to essential elements of doctrine of res judicata: 214 S.C. 241, 52 S.E.2d 22; 118 S.C. 470, 111 S.E. 15; 199 S.C. 363, 19 S.E.2d 648; 30 Am. Jur. 914, Judgments, Sec. 172; 214 S.C. 177, 51 S.E.2d 622....

Case Date: October 04, 1955

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

89 S.E.2d 376 (S.C. 1955), 17069, Antrum v. Hartsville Production Credit Ass'n

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

South Carolina - 31 S.E.2d 317 (S.C. 1944), 15674, Watson v. Goldsmith
South Carolina - 32 S.E.2d 147 (S.C. 1944), 15689, Bagwell v. Hinton
South Carolina - 35 S.E.2d 47 (S.C. 1945), 15749, First Nat. Bank of Greenville v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
South Carolina - 74 S.E.2d 828 (S.C. 1953), 16719, Dunlap v. Travelers Ins. Co.
South Carolina - 89 S.E.2d 369 (S.C. 1955), 17070, Hemingway v. Mention