89 S.E.2d 280 (S.C. 1955), 17068, Maxwell v. Smith

Citation: 89 S.E.2d 280, 228 S.C. 182

Opinion Judge: LEGGE, Justice.

Party Name: W. Robert MAXWELL et al., Respondents, v. Sherman F. SMITH et al., Appellants.

Attorney: Messrs. Edens & Woodward, of Columbia, for Appellants, cite: As to the protective covenants in question not applying to the community house as altered and renovated: 233 N.Y. 75, 134 N.E. 842. As to respondents being guilty of such laches as would prevent a court of equity from enforcing the res...

Case Date: Monday September 26, 1955

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

89 S.E.2d 280 (S.C. 1955), 17068, Maxwell v. Smith

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

South Carolina - 195 S.E. 239 (S.C. 1938), 14608, Jackson v. Johnson
South Carolina - 46 S.E.2d 874 (S.C. 1948), 16059, Sprouse v. Winston
South Carolina - 55 S.E.2d 70 (S.C. 1949), 16259, Archambault v. Sprouse
South Carolina - 60 S.E.2d 59 (S.C. 1950), 16368, Langford v. State Bd. of Fisheries
South Carolina - 63 S.E.2d 459 (S.C. 1951), 16463, Archambault v. Sprouse

See all quotations