89 Cal.App.4th 496, D034398, Hicks v. E.T. Legg & Associates

Citation: 89 Cal.App.4th 496, 108 Cal.Rptr.2d 10

Opinion Judge: [8] The opinion of the court was delivered by: Benke, Acting P.J.

Party Name: Hicks v. E.T. Legg & Associates

Attorney: [7] George McGill for Plaintiffs and Appellants. Wingert, Grebing, Brubaker & Ryan, Norman A. Ryan and Brian P. Worthington for Defendant and Respondent E. T. Legg & Associates. The Buckley Firm and Jonathan C. Cavett; Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps, Charles A. Bird and Karen M. Clemes for Def...

Case Date: Friday May 25, 2001

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

89 Cal.App.4th 496, D034398, Hicks v. E.T. Legg & Associates

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 660 F.2d 1316 (9th Cir. 1981), 80-3435, Matter of Roach
Federal Cases - 101 F.3d 618 (9th Cir. 1996), 95-16489, In re Peters
California - 13 Cal.4th 764, S046075, People v. Cruz
California - 2 Cal.4th 342, S011486, Carma Developers, Inc. v. Marathon Development California, Inc.
California - 150 Cal.App.3d 187, 67241, Paulfrey v. Blue Chip Stamps

See all quotations