89 A.2d 458 (N.J. 1952), A-5, Midler v. Heinowitz

Citation: 89 A.2d 458, 10 N.J. 123

Opinion Judge: BRENNAN, JR. J.

Party Name: HARRY L. MIDLER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. ABRAHAM M. HEINOWITZ, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT

Attorney: Mr. Joseph Kraemer argued the cause for appellant. Mr. Andrew B. Crummy argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Crummy & Consodine, attorneys).

Judge Panel: For affirmance -- Justices Oliphant, Wachenfeld, Burling and Brennan. For modification -- Chief Justice Vanderbilt and Justice Heher. The opinion of the court was delivered by William J. Brennan, Jr., J. Burling, J. (concurring). Heher, J. (dissenting in part). Vanderbilt, C.J., joins in this dis...

Case Date: June 16, 1952

Court: New Jersey Supreme Court