88 S.E.2d 59 (S.C. 1955), 17021, Foster v. Canal Ins. Co.

Citation: 88 S.E.2d 59, 227 S.C. 322

Opinion Judge: LEGGE, Justice.

Party Name: R. H. FOSTER, Respondent, v. CANAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Inc., Appellant.

Attorney: Messrs. Joseph H. Hall, of Gaffney, and Leatherwood, Walker, Todd & Mann, of Greenville, for Appellant, cite: As to limited coverage insurance policies being valid, and the named limitations being binding on the insured: 215 N.C. 127, 1 S.E.2d 367; 80 Ga.App. SO, 55 S.E.2d 259; 234 N.C. 25, 65 S....

Case Date: June 20, 1955

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

88 S.E.2d 59 (S.C. 1955), 17021, Foster v. Canal Ins. Co.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

South Carolina - 117 S.E. 70 (S.C. 1923), 11123, Keistler Co. v. Aetna Ins. Co., Hartford, Conn.
South Carolina - 170 S.E. 833 (S.C. 1933), 13694, Hawkins v. North Carolina Mut. Life Ins. Co.
South Carolina - 193 S.E. 36 (S.C. 1937), 14537, Dukes v. Life Ins. Co. of Virginia
South Carolina - 195 S.E. 652 (S.C. 1938), 14636, Able v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of U.S.
South Carolina - 38 S.E.2d 111 (S.C. 1946), 15828, White v. Southern Ry. Co.